Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Markers module: PEP8 fixes and MEP10 documentation fixes #1803

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Mar 15, 2013
Merged

Markers module: PEP8 fixes and MEP10 documentation fixes #1803

merged 4 commits into from Mar 15, 2013

Conversation

NelleV
Copy link
Member

@NelleV NelleV commented Mar 4, 2013

Here is a patch on PEP8 changes and MEP10 compliance of the markers module.

The markers module did not have it's own documentation page for now, as the plots using markers's style imported the docstrings and concatenated them. As we decided not to do this anymore, the module now needs it's own documentation page. This patch implements this.

Cheers,
N

"^" triangle_up
"<" triangle_left
">" triangle_right
"1" tri_down
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Using your syntax I read this as 1 not '1'. As far as I can see, this makes a big difference (tri_down vs tickleft).

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you have a better way to denote a string? I've used the same syntax as for other strings (">", "^", etc)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How are we indicating 'none' as opposed to the python None? I would do the
same as that.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So it is consistant with the way it currently is. I'll document everything soon, so that we have a reference document with all the details of the new documentation.

@pelson
Copy link
Member

pelson commented Mar 15, 2013

1 comment to resolve but this looks good. 👍
Given @mdboom was the original author (AFAIK), I'd like to let @mdboom do the actual merge.

@mdboom
Copy link
Member

mdboom commented Mar 15, 2013

Looks good. Merging.

mdboom added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 15, 2013
Markers module: PEP8 fixes and MEP10 documentation fixes
@mdboom mdboom merged commit e2c092a into matplotlib:master Mar 15, 2013
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants